Files
gods-eye-view/changelog.d
Manjunath 0c025987ef fix(awareness): bound the range ring pulses so a parked view goes quiet
Review follow-up for the sonar pulses.

Bounded repaint: the pulses used to ask for a frame every 80 ms from a
setInterval for as long as a subject was shown, so a parked view
repainted at 12.5 fps indefinitely. They now run for 9 s (three ring
flashes) after a selection or a camera move, fading in and out over
1.2 s, then rest: the ring stands on screen at full strength, the pulse
lines and gradient disc are hidden, echoes stop, and nothing asks for
frames. A moving subject does not wake them, since a flying subject
moves on every refresh. The lifecycle's existing camera pose signature
wakes them.

No beat with the Cyber sonar: the setInterval is replaced by a
postRender-armed setTimeout on CYBER_SONAR_RENDER_INTERVAL_MS, as in
cyberSonarScene. Every drawn frame, whoever asked for it, re-arms the
request 80 ms later, so requests never land inside the detection
lane's 80 ms gate.

Reduced motion mid-session: a change listener on the media query
rebuilds the visual, and the same-subject refresh path rebuilds when
the preference no longer matches. The listener is removed in
clearVisual.

Readable edge: restOpacity goes from 0 to 0.4, so the 250 km ring stays
visible between flashes, in screenshots and for low-vision viewers.

The echo field takes an optional level so echoes rest with the pulses.
CURRENT-STATE and the changelog fragment describe the bounded run and
the dimmed ring.

Tests: render requests stop after the bound and stay stopped for a
minute; a camera move seen by the lifecycle wakes them for another
bounded run; a foreign frame postpones the next request to 80 ms after
it; reduced motion flipped by event and by a later refresh; the ring
never drops below restOpacity; echoes scale with the level; the level
fades in, holds, fades out and keeps its value when woken.
2026-11-03 19:17:03 +05:30
..
2026-10-29 15:22:15 +04:00
2026-10-29 17:06:00 +04:00
2026-10-29 17:55:31 +04:00
2026-10-29 19:01:00 +04:00
2026-10-29 19:48:33 +04:00
2026-10-29 20:05:56 +04:00

Changelog fragments

One file per entry. A pull request adds a file here instead of editing CHANGELOG.md, and a release concatenates them into it.

changelog.d/<pull request number>-<slug>.md

723-atc-decision-layer.md, for example. The slug is lowercase, words separated by -. Two pull requests never pick the same filename, because the pull request number is already unique — which is the point: new CHANGELOG.md entries go at the top of the file, so two pull requests in flight write into the same few lines and git has nothing to merge on.

Write the file exactly as the entry should read in CHANGELOG.md: a - bullet, wrapped the way the surrounding entries are, crediting yourself and the pull request.

- Report which upstream declined a Street Traffic road load. The layer row now
  reads `Overpass rate-limited` instead of a general "Road data temporarily
  unavailable" (yourname, #665).

The text is spliced in unchanged apart from trailing whitespace, so what you write here is what ships. Fragments are deliberately outside scripts/format-scope.json, so npm run format never reflows one.

At release time:

npm run changelog:check   # list what would move, change nothing
npm run changelog         # move every fragment into CHANGELOG.md

The assembler refuses a batch rather than guessing: a filename that is not <pull request>-<slug>.md, or two fragments claiming one pull request number, stops the run before anything is written and names the files.

If npm run changelog fails part-way (a full disk, a killed process), run it again. The batch is staged in changelog.d/.assembling/ and only lands when the assembled file replaces CHANGELOG.md in a single rename, so the rerun either finishes that batch or puts its fragments back first. It never adds an entry twice or drops one. npm run changelog:check names a staged batch, if one is left over, instead of reporting past it.

A documentation claim that needs a regression test — the way src/annotations/drawTool.test.mjs asserts against CHANGELOG.md — should assert against docs/CURRENT-STATE.md or README.md instead. A pull request still edits those directly, so the text is in the file while the change is under review; a fragment does not reach CHANGELOG.md until release.