Files
gods-eye-view/changelog.d
Sameh Khamis f120989a2b docs(cctv): say the Houston pack needs TxDOT's written permission to enable
TranStar's Content Usage terms prohibit copying, distribution and
external framing of its images without TxDOT's prior written
permission. The opt-in text only said the pack was off unless
CCTV_HOUSTON_ENABLED=1, without saying what an operator needs before
setting it. Say "enable only if you hold TxDOT's written permission" in
.env.example, the README, DATA_SOURCES.md, CURRENT-STATE and the
changelog, matching the NYC and Florida packs, and fix the column of the
.env.example comment.

The houston-cctv credit now reads "(Houston, when enabled)" and links
the Content Usage terms, like the Florida credit. Where the docs said
frames are "never stored or redistributed", they now say what happens:
frames are relayed on demand, buffered only per request, sent with
no-store and not archived.
2026-11-03 15:03:37 -08:00
..
2026-10-29 15:22:15 +04:00
2026-10-29 17:06:00 +04:00
2026-10-29 17:55:31 +04:00
2026-10-29 19:01:00 +04:00
2026-10-29 19:48:33 +04:00
2026-10-29 20:05:56 +04:00

Changelog fragments

One file per entry. A pull request adds a file here instead of editing CHANGELOG.md, and a release concatenates them into it.

changelog.d/<pull request number>-<slug>.md

723-atc-decision-layer.md, for example. The slug is lowercase, words separated by -. Two pull requests never pick the same filename, because the pull request number is already unique — which is the point: new CHANGELOG.md entries go at the top of the file, so two pull requests in flight write into the same few lines and git has nothing to merge on.

Write the file exactly as the entry should read in CHANGELOG.md: a - bullet, wrapped the way the surrounding entries are, crediting yourself and the pull request.

- Report which upstream declined a Street Traffic road load. The layer row now
  reads `Overpass rate-limited` instead of a general "Road data temporarily
  unavailable" (yourname, #665).

The text is spliced in unchanged apart from trailing whitespace, so what you write here is what ships. Fragments are deliberately outside scripts/format-scope.json, so npm run format never reflows one.

At release time:

npm run changelog:check   # list what would move, change nothing
npm run changelog         # move every fragment into CHANGELOG.md

The assembler refuses a batch rather than guessing: a filename that is not <pull request>-<slug>.md, or two fragments claiming one pull request number, stops the run before anything is written and names the files.

If npm run changelog fails part-way (a full disk, a killed process), run it again. The batch is staged in changelog.d/.assembling/ and only lands when the assembled file replaces CHANGELOG.md in a single rename, so the rerun either finishes that batch or puts its fragments back first. It never adds an entry twice or drops one. npm run changelog:check names a staged batch, if one is left over, instead of reporting past it.

A documentation claim that needs a regression test — the way src/annotations/drawTool.test.mjs asserts against CHANGELOG.md — should assert against docs/CURRENT-STATE.md or README.md instead. A pull request still edits those directly, so the text is in the file while the change is under review; a fragment does not reach CHANGELOG.md until release.