Realign periodic polling to the deadline after a visibility catch-up

An overdue refresh on return to a visible tab advanced the due time but kept
the old setInterval phase, so the next phase tick was skipped and the gap
could approach two intervals (also after a failed resume refresh). The
catch-up now re-arms the interval at the new deadline. Interval ticks no
longer compare against the due time, since the phase and the deadline share
one origin. Overlap prevention and teardown are unchanged, and a stale
listener cannot re-arm a stopped loop.

Tests cover the next poll one interval after a between-ticks resume, with a
successful and a failed catch-up refresh.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>

src/data/manager.test.mjs

@@ -3523,3 +3523,61 @@ test('periodic polls pause hidden, catch up once when due, and dispose visibilit
   t.mock.timers.tick(10000);
   assert.equal(calls.update, 3);
 });
+
+async function resumeBetweenTicks(t, { failResume = false } = {}) {
+  const listeners = new Set();
+  const doc = {
+    hidden: false,
+    addEventListener: (_name, fn) => listeners.add(fn),
+    removeEventListener: (_name, fn) => listeners.delete(fn),
+  };
+  t.mock.timers.enable({ apis: ['setInterval', 'Date'], now: 1000 });
+  const { LayerLifecycle } = await import('./lifecycle.js');
+  const manager = new LayerLifecycle({}, { visibilityTarget: doc });
+  const { module, calls } = makeSlowLayer('resume-poll');
+  const updates = [];
+  module.update = async () => {
+    calls.update++;
+    updates.push(Date.now());
+    await Promise.resolve();
+    if (failResume && updates.length === 2) throw new Error('resume failed');
+  };
+  manager.register(module);
+  await manager.setEnabled('resume-poll', true);
+  assert.deepEqual(updates, [1000]);
+  doc.hidden = true;
+  t.mock.timers.tick(1000); // 2000: due tick skipped while hidden
+  t.mock.timers.tick(500); // 2500: return between ticks
+  doc.hidden = false;
+  for (const fn of listeners) fn();
+  assert.deepEqual(updates, [1000, 2500], 'overdue poll runs once on return');
+  await Promise.resolve();
+  await Promise.resolve();
+  await Promise.resolve();
+  const managerRefreshError = manager.layers.get('resume-poll').managerRefreshError;
+  if (failResume) assert.equal(managerRefreshError, 'resume failed');
+  else assert.equal(managerRefreshError, null);
+  t.mock.timers.tick(999); // 3499: the old 3000 phase must not fire
+  assert.deepEqual(updates, [1000, 2500]);
+  t.mock.timers.tick(1); // 3500: one interval after the resume poll
+  assert.deepEqual(updates, [1000, 2500, 3500]);
+  await Promise.resolve();
+  await Promise.resolve();
+  await Promise.resolve();
+  t.mock.timers.tick(1000);
+  assert.deepEqual(updates, [1000, 2500, 3500, 4500], 'new phase keeps one interval');
+  await Promise.resolve();
+  await Promise.resolve();
+  await manager.destroyAll();
+  assert.equal(listeners.size, 0);
+  t.mock.timers.tick(5000);
+  assert.equal(updates.length, 4);
+}
+
+test('periodic polls realign to the deadline after a between-ticks resume', async (t) => {
+  await resumeBetweenTicks(t);
+});
+
+test('periodic polls realign to the deadline after a failed resume refresh', async (t) => {
+  await resumeBetweenTicks(t, { failResume: true });
+});